Question:
How come Guns N' Roses isn't in the Rock N Roll Hall of Fame...?
?
2010-10-21 17:40:41 UTC
Nirvana too. Also, is The Who in the Rock N Roll Hall of Fame?

One last question. If Guns N' Roses ever gets in the Rock N Roll Hall of Fame, will it be the original band members accepting the award? Will Slash, Axl, Duff, Izzy, and Steven finally reunite?!
Eighteen answers:
AtS- Abraxas
2010-10-22 08:46:42 UTC
There are Trolls who probably know more about R'n'R than the so called "hall of shame". They have little or no credibilty anymore, and may as well induct Mylie whatever-her name is, just to receive some financial backing from Disney!.....



.....or the XFactor.....



.....or "Pop Idol"
Zapata
2010-10-22 13:24:15 UTC
Artists only become eligible for induction to the Hall of Fame 25 years after the release of their first record.



That means GnR become eligible in 2012, and Nirvana in 2014.



The Who were inducted to the Hall of Fame in 1990.



Regarding original members of a band being inducted, its the band as a whole who are inducted not the individual members. Something similar happened when Blondie were inducted a few years ago..they allowed two original members who had left to accept the award on stage with them, but didn't want to play with them.
Pretty Vacant and We Dont Care
2010-10-22 00:56:04 UTC
i think it is only bands/singers that have been an influence for 25 years or more that can be accepted. nirvana was not a band for that long, but i wish they were.

yes, the who are part of it.

and anyways, the rock n roll hall of fame is stupid. why do some people determine whether a band is good or not just because they are in a group?
2010-10-25 22:10:53 UTC
"You're out of your mind if you think Guns N' Roses doesn't deserve a spot on there.. Wow."



No.

Its a matter of opinion. They have fans, and they have people who hate them. And frankly, there are WAY MORE bands that deserve to be in it before them.
Colin Wholigan
2010-10-22 00:52:27 UTC
GNR will be eligible in 2012!



The classic lineup should be in the hall,not the current lineup,who are the biggest bunch of musical thieves around.
J. Scanlon
2010-10-22 00:51:29 UTC
because, there is a waiting time of (i think) 25 years after a band's debut album is released before they can enter the hall of fame



GNR and Nirvana are not yet eligible.
Kingler
2010-10-22 04:18:30 UTC
Most bands / artists that ARE in there don't deserve to be. Bands like GnR, and KISS being left out makes it even more of a joke!
Jake Milne
2010-10-22 03:13:41 UTC
I agree.

Another Fact, KISS isn't in the hall of fame, but Madonna is. Some of the guys who choose are on crack.
Fortress
2010-10-22 11:38:56 UTC
Slash doesn't suck, Guns N' Roses do lol
2010-10-22 00:45:22 UTC
Give up on the Rock N Roll Hall of Fame.



In my opinion, there are a lot of artists that should be there who aren't, and there are a lot of artists who aren't even rock and are in there.
achtung12001
2010-10-22 12:24:14 UTC
Can't believe anyone would think they deserve a place.
MB30
2010-10-23 14:32:38 UTC
hahahaha...after 25 years since 1st album artist can be inducted...but gnr won't be inducted...they aren't legends, they're just bunch of idiots...it says legends, are they legends??did they behave like legends??

NO!!
2010-10-22 00:41:59 UTC
hahahahahaHAHAHAHAHA!!!

*wipes tears*



GnR? Hall of Fame?

That would the day the world ends..
-
2010-10-22 18:01:02 UTC
Quite Alright are absolutely right !



:)
sir crap a lot
2010-10-22 00:44:31 UTC
because they made like a whopping 5 songs...give me a break
JohnDicksey123
2010-10-22 11:30:40 UTC
lolwat?



Slash is awesome though
2010-10-22 00:44:31 UTC
PFFT GnR suck! listen to REAL MUSIC
2010-10-22 00:44:29 UTC
who the **** cares those bands suck ***


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...